I love
David’s boldness as he confronts Goliath. His boldness isn’t his own will power, he spends a lot of
time with God, alone, tending sheep. His confidence began when he found his
strength in God. When men run in fear, David knows the truth. That’s the
difference. David knows the truth. God is here for us. God is there for His
people. He will conquer the giants in our lives. He is stronger than those
issues. We can be confident to move forward when we truly know who our Father
really is….I have some advice, decide to get to know your true Father.
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Good Mood?
I realized God gave me a good strategy for dealing with tough issues. Why have a bad mood? How can that benefit to sulk?
Everyday I remember God is good. Take a look outside yourself, it doesn’t matter if things are hard, if you die, God always has a hold of you when we trust on Him. Remember we have a choices to trust Him or not. You’re in His hands, He will provide for you no matter what happens. It doesn’t matter if you are forced to work hard, there is no benefit from being lazy, so why not give it your all? No matter what happens in life and death, He loves you and has ahold of you. Just rest in that.
That doesn’t mean, “don’t work or don’t work at things” He gave us work, so do your work and rest in the peace that our Father will always provide.
Matthew 11:29-30, Matthew 6:25-34, Luke 12:22-34, Ecclesiastes 9:10
Monday, September 29, 2014
Humble like a Lamb
I've debated ALOT of people in my experience with trying to let people see what God did for us. One day I was thinking about people and my frustration. I thought, "why can't they see what God did for us. There is so much evidence scientifically, historically, socially and logically."
I had since my 20's, gave up trying to convince people with logic. People can't initially believe with their minds. I'm not saying, "you can't think." I'm just saying our preconceived notions, our pride, and fear get in the way like a blockade.
Jesus is brilliant. He said, "they may indeed see but not perceive, and may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven (mark 4:12). This is not a sad verse. God isn't preventing people from hearing and seeing. Jesus was just stating a fact. If "they" (people in general) humble themselves they can see and hear! We don't know anything about the spiritual world everybody. That is the truth. We've never seen it, I hope none of us are dead yet.
I was recently thinking about my frustration with an individual, I thought, "It's like they're blind, how can I even show them Jesus? They'll die if I fail! They won't go to heaven!" Then God brought to my mind, "come as a little child (Matthew 18:3)." I realized God used stories to relate salvation to people and said, we need to humble ourselves and become like little children (to enter heaven)! What do little children do? They trust the one with authority and are humble. That doesn't mean, "never learn anything." He gave us brains to think. Our brains allow us to realize who He is, then we can turn and be amazed at the One who is all. At the start of knowing God, we need to come with our eyes and ears as a child. We aren't that cool. The Lord is perfect. He is our King, He is our ultimate provider, He is love, and our peace when the waters are out of control around us.
Knowing the truth of who He is, is true humility.
I had since my 20's, gave up trying to convince people with logic. People can't initially believe with their minds. I'm not saying, "you can't think." I'm just saying our preconceived notions, our pride, and fear get in the way like a blockade.
Jesus is brilliant. He said, "they may indeed see but not perceive, and may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven (mark 4:12). This is not a sad verse. God isn't preventing people from hearing and seeing. Jesus was just stating a fact. If "they" (people in general) humble themselves they can see and hear! We don't know anything about the spiritual world everybody. That is the truth. We've never seen it, I hope none of us are dead yet.
I was recently thinking about my frustration with an individual, I thought, "It's like they're blind, how can I even show them Jesus? They'll die if I fail! They won't go to heaven!" Then God brought to my mind, "come as a little child (Matthew 18:3)." I realized God used stories to relate salvation to people and said, we need to humble ourselves and become like little children (to enter heaven)! What do little children do? They trust the one with authority and are humble. That doesn't mean, "never learn anything." He gave us brains to think. Our brains allow us to realize who He is, then we can turn and be amazed at the One who is all. At the start of knowing God, we need to come with our eyes and ears as a child. We aren't that cool. The Lord is perfect. He is our King, He is our ultimate provider, He is love, and our peace when the waters are out of control around us.
Knowing the truth of who He is, is true humility.
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
He Forever Calls To Us (psalms 46)
What should we do now? When we have no
money? When our family is losing it? When we lose our job? When earth is
shaking? When the sky caves in? When I have nothing to stand on? Where will I
go? What can I do? What can people say?
My Father is the Lord God who made
everything. He promises to hold on to me! He says to be calm in the storm, He
was even asleep inside the chaos (Matthew 8:23-27)! To sleep, you can’t be
worried. That my friends, is a fact. Be calm , He commands us in Psalms 46:10 to “Be
still and know that I am God,” calmly. He fights for you if you would “be
still, and know….” That doesn’t make sense! Neither does any faith in anyone,
unless you know that person. Sooo, our God and Father says, “Come(to me)
Matthew 11:28-29.” He is our rest! He is our peace.
“wisdom
cries aloud in the streets,
She
raises her voice; at the head of
The
noisy streets she cries out.”
-Proverbs
1:20-21a
To trust Him, learn about your father. Spend time with
Him. I can’t tell you who He is. We can’t really know it or believe it unless
we discover it for ourselves through experience.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
gods.... (Judges 17)
In those days,
Israel didn’t have much focus. “Micah” an Israelite, returned 1,100 pieces of
silver to his mother. His mother was thankful and had an imaged carved. Micah
kept the image in his home with the collection of “house gods” that he had. He
then made his own son a priest! Everything in the bible aren't prescribed teachings of what
to do that is right. Sometimes the bible is just reporting the state of things at given moments at certain locations. The people of Israel did what they thought was right. So they did things like make their own sons priests.... I think the fascination
with gods wasn’t really the worship of something they didn’t understand. I
think it’s really an exterior worship of “self.” They were able to make their
own rules, their own religion and no bounds. No one could tell them different.
They could do what they wanted. They could form the personality of that image
how they saw fit. They would be god.
It’s kind of the
same thing with us today. We aren’t more “evolved,” The only difference is we
don’t use idols anymore. We’re more blunt, we don’t hide our worship of other
things. We make certain “things” in our lives more important than they should
be. We forget about God and make our own rules. Then it works out because we’re
able to worship ourselves. That really doesn’t fill us. It just satisfies us for
a temporary time.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Turn and see (mark 4:12)
“They may indeed see but not perceive and
may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven.”
I’ve read this before and always dismissed
it as, “oh it’s just some Jesus thing, I’m sure it means something but it
doesn’t make sense now.” I really think this is brilliant. Over the past year,
one thing I’ve recognized about telling people some new knowledge, they
generally don’t really believe it until they see it/find out themselves. I’m
the same way! It’s kinda human nature for adults. That’s why He says to come
like a child. Children often just trust, they accept, they have faith, and they
haven’t been burned by the world enough to set up the barriers we as adults set
up to protect ourselves. Parables are stories that have Spiritual meaning(s).
You don’t know that they have Spiritual truths immediately though. A listener
would just think, “Ohhh it’s a story teller!” A story breaks barriers and makes
you think about it and ponder it. My favorite parable is the story of “The
Prodigal Son.” I love it because the Father is pretty awesome. He gives to His
sons their inheritance early. He allows them to make real life choices. What’ll
hit you is that’s our Father (God, Yahweh) does for us. Then what blows me away
even more is in Luke 15:20, the Father sees Him from far off, throws down
everything and “runs” to His son who is, by the way still far off. Our God,
Father gives us the free choice to choose, after we go through life, screw up,
and then by our own free will His way is better, He runs. Our God, the King,
the maker of heaven and earth, humbles Himself to love His children!? Wow,
we’re worth that much? I’m completely undone guys. God, my true Father became a
human, to save us, and is making (made) a home for us to live forever in peace.
How much of an epic story is this? It actually happened for us. For some it’s
happening still. If we decide to stay in our own power, to be arrogant enough
that we can do it alone. We will by default be saying, “I don’t need you.” This
is what satan Himself did. He thought He was "all that," he thought he didn’t
need God (Isaiah 14:12-15, Ezekiel 28:14-19). Once we make that default decision, we’re ultimately counted with the
enemy. The home for us is with God our Lord, but we choose to be with ourselves, so He
lets us go. That default choice is definitely a place where we are our own,
it’s Hell. We would spend our eternity forever alone.
The point behind parables is to bypass
our stubborn nature and see those Spiritual truths, to those who turn and see
the meanings. Kind of like the prodigal son saw the pig slob he was eating, we realize the path "our" own choices took as. We see the pig slop we chose and we turn and see our Father who gave us so much (Mark 4:12).
Stories make truth more palatable and less offensive to our stubborn thoughts
of “self” and our own wants. Jesus is brilliant.
Can You Prove God Philosophically?
In all the universe, there are thoughts and
ideas that define universal things. We love, we hate, we think, and we aren't
immune to the universal truths in this existence. The very first foundational
thing that must be established before proving anything is that, truth exists.
It sounds almost contradictory to prove that truth exists because by trying to
prove anything, one is proving that truth exists, that premise is undoubtedly
based on the truth believed. Therefore, to believe that truth does not exist,
is to believe that truth exists because one believes something. Furthermore, to
trust in science, or history, or to believe that anything can be learned, is to
believe that truth exists. Regardless of what modern philosophy teaches, truth
is not relative because the definition of truth is something undoubtedly
correct. Life itself is based on truth. In the most honest way, a cell conducts
its programmed responsibility to bring oxygen where it must be, as well as
performing its other functions. The truth is that the cell works. It works
because the machines it's based on work. Those machines and molecules are based
on systems smaller than most of us can comprehend, and they work
systematically. Any system working is in its most basic way, is truth. It is
truth because it's based on laws that govern it. One knows the laws that govern
a cellular machine because the machine works. This reasoning continues in a
circular fashion. The question goes, can God be philosophically provable?
Throughout history, philosophers attempt to prove this very thing. One of the
most well known philosophers and theologians who attempted to prove this is
Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas is not the only philosopher to seek the answer to this
question. The question has revolved throughout the history of the human race,
even today it ranges as the hottest topic. If someone says anything about God,
ears perk up. Instantly interests are brought to attention. There are only two
choices to the question of God. In the infinite spectrum of understanding, if
there is a true answer, there is undoubtedly reason and evidence to believe
that reason. A truth cannot exist without reason to believe it. God is true,
so there must be a reason to believe he exists. The concept of God and God
himself is a provable philosophical concept. If God isn’t true, there is
evidence to coincide. As Sir Author Conan Doyle said, with his unusually potent
logic, “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever
remains, however improbable, must be the truth” (Doyle 375).
Aristotle had his own evidence for God. For anything to exist, there must be an
eternal form to begin the process. Aristotle proposed that there is an “Unmoved
Mover” (Sproul 49). That for anything to begin, the mover must have been
eternal and unmovable. Thomas Aquinas later attaches his own ideas onto this
very same philosophical argument. Aristotle lays down the foundation of his
argument saying that “everything is both the form or reality which has grown
out of something which was its matter or raw material; and it may in its turn
be the matter out of which still higher forms will grow” (Durant 56).
Basically, Aristotle is saying that you can’t toss random matter into a pot and
birth life. Life does not birth from death. A dog comes from an embryo and is
born of another dog. That matter is an organized map of protein. Before that,
protein is organized into its most basic components of carbon, hydrogen,
oxygen, and nitrogen (Tortora 44). It has the potential of being formed, not
the actuality of form. In the same way, a sculptor does not make a statue of a
great warrior by letting formless clay sit by itself or be twisted around in a
tornado. Of course not, the sculptor arranges it as he should have it, and so
the creation of this statue is in order because it was placed in order. This
argument is similar to the argument that nothing can come from nothing. If you
have no direction or form in the beginning, you will not end up with form,
because there is simply no form without purpose. All things on earth serve a
purpose, even formless matter, but only to be used as a supply for form. From
this argument, you can evolve to understand the “Unmoved Mover,” argument
(Sproul 49).
Since order cannot come without order, who or what started this order, and what
is the nature of this entity? The Unmoved Mover argument is the theory of God.
Aristotle deduced that for God to exist, he must be the ultimate reality or
“pure actuality.” He is the potential, the choice, being, eternity, Alpha and
Omega, and true actuality. If the Unmoved Mover were simply the first “Mover,”
that Mover would also need a Mover and there would be an endless number of Movers.
Thomas Aquinas later expounded on this argument saying, “It has been shown that
God is the first Unmoved Mover. Now the first Mover, moves no less than the
second Movers; more so, indeed because without Him they do not move other
things” (Aquinas 113). Richard Dawkins narrows his ideals a slight bit more in
the book, God Delusion, “ Nothing moves without a prior mover. This
leads us to a regress, from which the only escape is God. Something had to make
the first move, and that something we call God” (Dawkins 77). To dispute this
claim, there are predictable avenues to follow. Richard Dawkins, popular
atheist author lays out his argument saying that this is a good argument
except, Thomas Aquinas “assumes” that God is immune to regress (Dawkins 77.78).
Dawkins solution sounds valid except through closer analysis. If God is immune
to regress, God is not all powerful. If God is not all powerful, the question
of how everything began is left open because if God is not immune to regress,
there is a mover before that mover. Is this confusing enough yet? This fallacy
is a very complicated fallacy. Dawkins answers the question without answering
it. He demonstrates a logical fallacy called a Straw man essentially redefining
and creating his own scenario for the Unmoved Mover, and disproving it. Dawkins
condemns the concept of God being Unmovable by assuming that an Unmoved mover
is an assumption. He builds his argument on these two flaws. Of course
God can’t exist if he isn’t immune to regression, that’s why Thomas Aquinas
doesn’t believe the existence of God is regress-able. The reason Aquinas and
Aristotle believe there is an Unmoved Mover is because there must be. It's
undeniable to reason anything other than that there was a first mover. If there
was no mover, how did anything begin to move? All other possible truths are
eliminated and an Unmoved Mover is the last avenue offered for the existence of
the universe. It can't be believed that everything has always moved because
matter is not immune to regression. Current science shows us that there was a
beginning in the universe. Dawkins’ reasoning is a circular argument leaving
the question that the Unmoved Mover was supposed to answer, open like a wound
still yet to be bandaged. The assumption that Dawkins presumes, is in fact the
only option available. If it can be proved that dead matter and everything form
order, regenerates itself and is on an ever progressing path, Dawkins’ argument
deserves a second look. However, we’re still left with another question, if
everything regenerates itself without plan or purpose, founded on mere chance,
where did everything come from? Since science tells us that the universe had a
beginning, for anything to exist with order, there must be an absolute threshold
by which all things come from. If an absolute threshold doesn't exist,
everything in existence is left to the merciless hands of nothing, and how can
anything exist without plan?
To greater understand the argument for
the Unmoved Mover, there must be a reason why Aristotle believed that the mover
must be the ultimate reality. There are three possibilities for how the universe
came into being. First, the Universe was an infinite and absolute nothing.
Since nothing can come from nothing as earlier described, this argument can be
crossed out. The second is that matter in the universe existed for all
eternity, but without a plan, it’s the same as saying nothing makes nothing.
This argument depends foundationally on
chance for the development of everything. As described by R.C. Sproul in his
book The Consequences of Ideas, “Chance is a perfectly meaningless term
to describe mathematical possibilities, but the word becomes a sneaky bogeyman
when used to describe something that has not power to influence anything.
Chance has no being, and that which has no being has no power to do anything”
(75). Chance is another word for nothing, and nothing makes nothing without a
plan. Can you imagine flinging metal and other natural resources into a pile,
letting it sit for millions of years, and expecting it to produce a computer?
We established that chance doesn’t
create anything; therefore, this argument raises yet another question, where did
the original matter come from? Through science, we are told that time and space
had a beginning. The second argument can be thoroughly discarded. The third
possibility is an ultimate actuality. This is why the ancients held on to this
so called, “assumption.” Like everything else in the universe, this conclusion
wasn’t arrived at by chance. Aristotle believed that it may have been possible
for matter to have always existed, but it could not have moved into form
without a mover to move it. Aristotle’s god is not like the Christian God. His
god is passionless and really only sits around doing nothing but think. Since,
he made everything and knows everything intimately, he doesn’t have much to do
but nothing. In this way, Aristotle’s god is perfect, without desire because he
has everything, and nothing to take up his eternal time (Sproul 47). This
employs yet another question. If God is passionless, and does nothing, why did
he create the universe? The argument has now been “moved” from truth, to
existence, to existence needing a mover. Knowing the argument we know, God as a
mover must exist. Having already been through the argument of purpose, we know that
all things need purpose! Aristotle leaves us hanging with the notion that God
simply does nothing for without purpose, thereby disrupting his own rules. God
as a mover is a necessary argument for the nature of the universe. But one must
still ask, why would an eternal God, want to create us or anything if he is
passionless.
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen 1.1). This is
one of the most famous, statements in the world. Since it was written, it has
since encompassed all religions, and all religions battle for the right to
define who God is. Assume for a minute that God is evil. If God is evil, why
should he create anything beautiful? Why should food taste good or sex feel
good? Why do we laugh? Yes there is pain in the world, but if God is not evil
because he created so many good things for us, then one must assume that
something went horribly wrong. For if God created the world and it was good,
evil would be good as well. We know that evil is not good. If God is perfect,
he would create a perfect world. What is the answer? The answer is free will.
If God created a world where everyone was automatically good, humanity would
certainly not be the one making that decision. Instead, God would have made
that decision and free will would not exist. Instead, bionic robots would roam
the earth and simply exist. However, if free will exists, emotion exists. Here
the Mover takes a huge risk giving humanity the ability to reject or accept the
Him. This is the purpose for much of the pain in the world, because humanity
has a choice to be good or be evil. Without free will, love does not exist. If
there is a creator, all humans must have something in them that is also of the
maker. Every artist leaves his touch. All humans need love. We all need to love
and be loved. In the same way, the reason for free will is that love can exist.
Picture someone who has a child, and they are a father to that child. This
father instructed his child to everyday come and tell him, “I love you daddy.” Picture
another father with a child, and this father didn’t instruct the child to say
anything, but every so often that child out of his own free will, came to him
and said, “I love you daddy.” Which “I love you,” means more? In the same way,
it can be concluded that God must have created free will for that purpose.
Putting the idea of freewill and love together, one is left with one more
question, why again did God create humanity? There is one thing that cannot be
unless a person has free will, the ability to love. The ability to love makes
living worthwhile. To force love would not be love, but true love can only be
given through free will. For God to exist, extending our conclusions by way of
a logical chain, God is love and must be love. God cannot simply be a
passionless Unmoved Mover, for that leaves us wondering why we exist. If God or
the Unmoved Mover exists, a person cannot ask why God exists, only why things
are the way they are. God simply exists for an Unmoved Mover must do just that.
Philosophically God must be, but the nature of God is a far more interesting
question. It’s an interesting concept to believe that maybe everything exists
because of love. As the Apostle Paul says, “If I have the gift of prophecy and
can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing” (1 Cor 13.2). To prove that God is
philosophically provable, one must also come to the conclusion that God is
passionate and loves, without this conclusion, nothing would exist because
there’s no point. Furthermore, for God to be provably true, truth must exist.
In the question of everything, there is undoubtedly one truth in the universe
from which all come, for out of a lie or randomness, nothing true can be.
Works
Cited
Aquinas, Thomas. Basic
Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. Ed. Anton C.
Pegis. New York:
Random House, 1945. 113.
Dawkins, Richard. The
God Delusion. Great Britain: Transworld, 2006.
77-78.
Doyle, Sir Author C.
Complete Sherlock Holmes, Volume I. Vol. 1. New
York: Barnes
& Noble, 2003. 375.
The Holy Bible. 1
Cor. 13-2. NIV ed. Colorado Springs: International
Bible
Society, 1973.
The Holy Bible. Gen. 1.
NIV ed. Colorado Springs: International Bible
Society, 1973.
Durant, Will. The Story
of Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster,
1926. 56.
Sproul, R C. The
Consequences of Ideas. Wheaton,Illinois: Crossway
Books, 2000.
49.75.
Tortora, Gerard J.,
Berdell R. Funke, and Christine L. Case. Microbilogy
2nd ed.
Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Company, 1986. 44.
Can
You Prove God Philosophically Outline
I. Thesis: If God is
true, there must be a reason to believe he exists. The concept of God and God
himself is a provable philosophical concept. If God is not true, there is
evidence to the contrary.
II. Truth
A. Truth is foundational
B. You must have truth
to prove a stance
C. Life is based on
truth
III. Prove God
Philosophically
A. Two choices
1.God exists
2. God doesn’t exist
B. If God exists, there
is reason to believe so
IV. Actuality and
Potential
A. Everything comes from
something else
B. Order doesn’t form
without reason
V. Unmoved Mover
A. God must be pure
actuality
B. Dawkins against
Unmoved Mover
1. Aquinas assumes God doesn’t regress
C. Dawkin’s Logical
fallacy
VI. Why there must be an
Unmoved Mover
A. Three possibilities
1. Absolute nothing
2. Only matter existed
3. Unmoved Mover
B. Aristotle’s God
C. God’s purpose for
human life
VII. Why God must be a
Loving God
A. Why is there good?
Why is there evil?
B. Free will
C. Love a driving force
VIII. Why did God create
humanity
A. One thing an Omnipotent
God can’t have
B. Love
C. Interesting concept
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

